Les signes sensibles. Une lecture du « Poème du hachisch » de Charles Baudelaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une lecture de la première partie des Paradis artificiels de Baudelaire, dans laquelle sont décrits de manière détaillée les effets psychotropes de l’ingestion de hachisch. Au moyen des instruments de l’analyse littéraire microtextuelle, je m’attache à déterminer et à décrire les effets sémiotiques de la prise de hachisch sur les intoxiqués mis en scène dans ce « poème » : d’abord, une altération de la perception des signes ; ensuite, une transformation de leur mise en relation. J’inscris cette lecture dans le cadre plus large de la pensée baudelairienne des « correspondances » et confronte l’intensification du rapport sémiotique au monde provoquée par le hachisch à celle que permet la poésie, mettant ainsi en évidence le fait que le hachisch apparaît comme le moyen de faire l’expérimentation sensible d’un régime sémiotique auquel la poésie donne alternativement accès par la langue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".