MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303431023 · doi:10.7202/1091463ar

Les signes sensibles. Une lecture du « Poème du hachisch » de Charles Baudelaire

2022· article· fr· W4303431023 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCygne noir · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une lecture de la première partie des Paradis artificiels de Baudelaire, dans laquelle sont décrits de manière détaillée les effets psychotropes de l’ingestion de hachisch. Au moyen des instruments de l’analyse littéraire microtextuelle, je m’attache à déterminer et à décrire les effets sémiotiques de la prise de hachisch sur les intoxiqués mis en scène dans ce « poème » : d’abord, une altération de la perception des signes ; ensuite, une transformation de leur mise en relation. J’inscris cette lecture dans le cadre plus large de la pensée baudelairienne des « correspondances » et confronte l’intensification du rapport sémiotique au monde provoquée par le hachisch à celle que permet la poésie, mettant ainsi en évidence le fait que le hachisch apparaît comme le moyen de faire l’expérimentation sensible d’un régime sémiotique auquel la poésie donne alternativement accès par la langue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it