Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Constitution de l’Inde promettait de transformer la société hiérarchique en instaurant une communauté civique d’égaux. Les études anthropologiques montrent cependant que le statut de la citoyenneté en Inde et le faisceau de droits qui lui sont associés constituent le terrain de formulation de revendications et de contestations quotidiennes. Sur ce terrain, l’intermédiation est très importante, en partie à cause du pouvoir infrastructurel relativement limité de l’État et de son échec à assurer l’alphabétisation et l’éducation minimale de la population. Le fait que les « citoyens » doivent négocier avec l’État et la façon dont pour cela ils ont fréquemment besoin d’intermédiaires ont pour conséquence la création d’une hiérarchie de citoyens (ou plus exactement de citoyens, de clients et de quémandeurs) au lieu de la citoyenneté égale pour tous que promettait la Constitution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".