MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303437228 · doi:10.7202/1091821ar

From Activism to Artistic Practice: (Re)imagining Indigenous Women’s Labour Activism in Contemporary Art

2022· article· fr· W4303437228 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Erika Kindsfather

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversities Art Association of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtIndigenousPolitical scienceSociologyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1978, le personnel du restaurant Muckamuck de Vancouver s’est joint au Service, Office, and Retail Workers’ Union of Canada pour contester des conditions de travail injustes. Sous la direction de travailleuses en majorité autochtones, la grève a permis de conjuguer les préoccupations des mouvements féministes, de justice ouvrière et de souveraineté autochtone. Cet article examine les oeuvres de l’artiste Hunkpapa Lakota Dana Claxton, de l’artiste de la Première Nation Vuntut Gwitchin, Jeneen Frei Njootliet, et de l’organisation militante des femmes autochtones ReMatriate Collective qui traitent de la grève de 1978 pour explorer les intersections de la souveraineté autochtone, du travail et de la justice de genre dans les pratiques militantes passées et présentes. Cet article traite des manières par lesquelles ces artistes repensent la grève du Muckamuck par leurs engagements matériels avec les archives pour mettre en lumière les trajectoires de l’activisme des femmes autochtones au-delà de la conception linéaire du temps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0310.060
Scholarly communication0.0140.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207