MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303437339 · doi:10.7202/1091725ar

REVUE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE 2021 EN DROIT MUNICIPAL

2022· article· fr· W4303437339 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean Hétu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du notariat · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Immigration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisprudencePolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

recours en cessation d'usage ou en démolition devant la Cour supérieure . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.1.1La discrétion judiciaire et le respect de la réglementation de zonage . . . . . . . . . .2.1.2La démolition d'une maison de plus de trois millions de dollars malgré une dérogation mineure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.2 Le syndrome de Diogène . . . . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0190.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue du notariatSame topicHuman Rights and ImmigrationFrench-language works237,207