Access to diagnostic imaging and incidental detection of differentiated thyroid cancer in Ontario: A population-based retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Global increases in thyroid cancer incidence (≥90% differentiated thyroid cancers; DTC) are hypothesized to be related to increased use of pre-diagnostic imaging. These procedures can detect DTC during imaging for conditions unrelated to the thyroid (incidental detection). The objectives were to evaluate incidental detection of DTC associated with standardized, regional imaging capacity and drivetime from patient residence to imaging facility (the exposures). We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 32,097 DTC patients in Ontario, 2003-2017. We employed sex-specific spatial Bayesian hierarchical models to evaluate the exposures and examine the adjusted odds of incidental detection by administrative regions. Regional capacities of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scanners are positively associated with incidental detection, but vary by sex. Contrary to hypothesis, drivetimes in urban areas are positively associated with incidental detection. Access to primary care may play a role in several administrative regions with higher adjusted odds of incidental detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".