MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303453654 · doi:10.1051/epjap/2022220112

Improvement of the piezoelectric, thermal, structural properties of PMMA/PVdF-HFP blend composite films using PZT

2022· article· en· W4303453654 on OpenAlexaff
Salesabil Labihi, Khadija Oumghar, Nabil Chakhchaoui, Adil Eddiai, Mounir Meddad, Omar Cherkaοui, Mounir El Achaby, M’hammed Mazroui

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal Applied Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLead zirconate titanateComposite materialPiezoelectricityCastingComposite numberFerroelectricityDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy harvesting is the most efficient way to meet energy demand while also supplying renewable energy sources from the environment. This technology consists of recovering of electrical energy from lost energy sources, which are available everywhere, including heat, fluids, vibrations, etc. In particular, energy harvesting via piezoelectric materials, which can convert the energy of vibrations and mechanical deformations into electrical energy, has been the subject in the last decade. This energy is used in a variety of applications, including energy collectors, sensors, and actuators, among others. This study concerns the improvement and enhancement of the properties of Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Synthesized PMMA was blended with Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVdF-HFP), and Lead zirconate titanate (PZT) nanoparticles at various composition ratios using solvent casting technique in Tetrahydrofuran (THF). Improvement of properties has confirmed by POM, SEM, FTIR, XRD, TGA, DSC, and tensile testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal Applied PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207