MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303457099 · doi:10.1101/2022.10.05.510983

Resource-efficient Neural Network Architectures for Classifying Nerve Cuff Recordings on Implantable Devices

2022· preprint· en· W4303457099 on OpenAlexaff
Yi-Chin E. Hwang, Roman Genov, José Zariffa

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkConvolutional neural networkCuffFunctional electrical stimulationArtificial intelligenceNeuroscienceMedicineStimulationSurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Closed-loop control of functional electrical stimulation involves using recorded nerve signals to make decisions regarding nerve stimulation in real-time. Surgically implanted devices that can implement this strategy have significant potential to restore natural movement after paralysis. Previous work demonstrated the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to discriminate between activity from different neural pathways recorded by a high-density multi-contact nerve cuff electrode. Despite state-of-the-art performance, that approach required too much data storage, power and computation time for a practical implementation on surgically implanted hardware. Objective To reduce resource utilization for an implantable implementation, with a minimal performance loss for CNNs that can discriminate between neural pathways in multi-contact nerve cuff electrode recordings. Methods Neural network (NN) architectures were evaluated on a dataset of rat sciatic nerve recordings previously collected using 56-channel (7 x 8) spiral nerve cuff electrodes to capture spatiotemporal neural activity patterns. The NNs were trained to classify individual, natural compound action potentials (nCAPs) elicited by sensory stimuli. Three architecture types were explored: the previously reported ESCAPE-NET, a fully convolutional network, and a recurrent neural network. Variations of each architecture yielded NNs with a range in the number of weights and required floating-point operations (FLOPs). Each NN was evaluated based on F1-score and resource requirements. Results NNs were identified that, when compared to ESCAPE-NET, required 1,132-1,787x fewer weights, 389-995x less memory, and 6-11,073x fewer FLOPs, while maintaining macro F1-scores of 0.70-0.71 compared to a baseline of 0.75. Memory requirements range from 22.69 KB to 58.11 KB, falling within the range of on-chip memory sizes from several published deep learning accelerators fabricated in 65nm ASIC technology. Conclusion Reduced versions of ESCAPE-NET require significantly fewer resources without significant accuracy loss, thus can be more easily incorporated into a surgically implantable device that performs closed-loop real-time responsive neural stimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207