MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303488440 · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001974

Epithelioid and Spindle Cell Hemangioma

2022· article· en· W4303488440 on OpenAlexaff
David Papke, Jyothi P. Jagannathan, Fei Dong, Brendan C. Dickson, Fredrik Mertens, Jason L. Hornick, Christopher D.�M. Fletcher

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyEpithelioid cellMedicineHemangiomaEpithelioid hemangioendotheliomaCD31ImmunohistochemistrySoft tissueAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epithelioid and spindle cell hemangioma was initially described in 1999 in a series of primary bone tumors and was subsequently suggested by some to represent a variant of epithelioid hemangioma. Here, we studied 18 epithelioid and spindle cell hemangiomas. Nine patients (50%) were male. Age at presentation ranged from 12 to 78 years (median: 38.5 y). Nine patients (50%) had tumor(s) limited to bone, 5 (28%) had tumor(s) limited to soft tissue, and 4 (22%) had tumor(s) involving bone and soft tissue. Nine patients (50%) had multiple tumors, all in a unilateral anatomic region involving the wrist, hand, ankle, or foot. Seventeen tumors (94%) occurred in an extremity, including 12 (67%) in the hands and feet, and 1 occurred in a vertebra. In imaging studies, primary bone tumors were lobulated, expansile, and lytic, and 7 bone tumors with available imaging (58%) showed cortical breakthrough. Tumor sizes were 0.8 to 7.2 cm (median: 2.2 cm). Epithelioid and spindle cell hemangioma is composed of lobules of epithelioid and spindled endothelial cells with bland, vesicular nuclei. Neoplastic cells show orderly vasoformative growth, with hemorrhagic stroma and no endothelial atypia or multilayering. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated uniform positivity for CD31 and ERG. Where positive, SMA highlighted pericytes (11/13 tumors). FOSB was strongly positive in 4 of 16 tumors (25%), and FOS was strongly positive in 5 of 10 stained tumors (50%). Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of FOS split signals in 4 tumors positive for FOS by immunohistochemistry and FOSB split signals in 2 FOSB-positive tumors. DNA sequencing demonstrated a GATA6 :: FOXO1 fusion in 1 of 3 sequenced tumors. Clinical follow-up was available for 15 patients (83%; range: 5 mo to 11 y; median: 3.5 y). Seven patients (47%) had no evidence of disease at most recent follow-up. Seven of 13 patients (54%) who underwent surgery experienced local recurrence at the primary tumor site: 5 patients within a year, 1 at 2.4 years, and 1 thrice at 2, 3, and 5 years. Six patients were alive with multifocal disease (median: 3.5 y; range: 5 mo to 6 y). No tumors gave rise to distant metastases. The clinicopathologic and genetic findings in this study support the notion that epithelioid and spindle cell hemangioma is a morphologic variant of epithelioid hemangioma that can occur in soft tissue as well as bone and that shows a striking predilection for the extremities. Given that most recurrences and primary tumors behaved indolently, watchful waiting would be reasonable for patients with multicentric disease that is not readily amenable to surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicVascular Tumors and AngiosarcomasFrench-language works237,207