MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303646098 · doi:10.28991/hij-2022-03-03-07

DeepImageTranslator V2: Analysis of Multimodal Medical Images using Semantic Segmentation Maps Generated through Deep Learning

2022· article· en· W4303646098 on OpenAlexaff
En Zhou Ye, En Hui Ye, Maxime Bouthillier, Run Zhou Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueHighTech and Innovation Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSegmentationSoftwareConvolutional neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Analysis of multimodal medical images often requires the selection of one or many anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) for extraction of useful statistics. This task can prove laborious when a manual approach is used. We have previously developed a user-friendly software tool for image-to-image translation using deep learning. Therefore, we present herein an update to the DeepImageTranslator V2 software with the addition of a tool for multimodal medical image segmentation analysis (hereby referred to as the MMMISA). Methods: The MMMISA was implemented using the Tkinter library; backend computations were implemented using the Pydicom, Numpy, and OpenCV libraries. We tested our software using 4188 slices from whole-body axial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoroglucose-position emission tomography/ computed tomography scans ([¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT) of 10 patients from the American College of Radiology Imaging Network-Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ACRIN-HNSCC) database. Using the deep learning software DeepImageTranslator, a model was trained with 36 randomly selected CT slices and manually labelled semantic segmentation maps. Utilizing the trained model, all the CT scans of the 10 HNSCC patients were segmented with high accuracy. Segmentation maps generated using the deep convolutional network were then used to measure organ specific [¹⁸F]-FDG uptake. We also compared measurements performed using the MMMISA and those made with manually selected ROIs. Results: The MMMISA is a tool that allows user to select ROIs based on deep learning-generated segmentation maps and to compute accurate statistics for these ROIs based on coregistered multimodal images. We found that organ-specific [¹⁸F]-FDG uptake measured using multiple manually selected ROIs is concordant with whole-tissue measurements made with segmentation maps using the MMMISA tool. Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2022-03-03-07 Full Text: PDF

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighTech and Innovation JournalSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207