MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303649470 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100692

Parametric investigation of internal Y-shaped fin configurations under natural convection in a concentric annulus

2022· article· en· W4303649470 on OpenAlexafffund
Aidan Hickie-Bentzen, Mostafa Elsharqawy, Syeda Humaira Tasnim, Shohel Mahmud

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFinAnnular finNatural convectionNusselt numberMechanicsHeat transferEnclosureMaterials scienceThermodynamicsConvective heat transferHeat transfer coefficientPhysicsReynolds numberTurbulenceEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural convection heat transfer inside concentric annular enclosures has been well researched for decades. Such enclosures have been employed as intermediate layers between fluid streams in heat exchangers, particularly in latent heat thermal energy storage applications. Convection heat transfer coefficients originating from natural convection are relatively low, which drives the need for heat transfer enhancements by using extended surfaces (e.g., fins, heat sinks). In this study, numerical simulations are performed to investigate the natural convection heat transfer inside a concentric annulus in the presence of Y-shaped fins. Each Y-shaped fin has four important geometric parameters: (i) length of the fin base a, (ii) length of the fin branches b (i.e., the V-section), (iii) primary fin spacing angle θ, and (iv) secondary fin angle or branch angle α. Steady-state simulations are conducted using COMSOL Multiphysics® with constant temperature boundary conditions to generate the laminar natural convection profiles in the enclosure filled with air. The average Nusselt numbers, calculated at both the inner and outer walls of the enclosure, are used to gauge the heat transfer. The model is built with thin layer approximated fins first and subsequently compared to a modified model with fins with finite thickness. The optimized case using the thick fin model is found to yield a percent increase in Nu of 358.8% compared to the case with no fins. Lastly, the entropy generation is considered to determine the second law efficiency of the system, which is approximately 91%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in EngineeringSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207