BamQuery: a proteogenomic tool for the genome-wide exploration of the immunopeptidome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT MHC-I-associated peptides (MAPs) derive from selective yet highly diverse genomic regions, including allegedly non-protein-coding sequences, such as endogenous retroelements (EREs). Quantifying canonical (exonic) and non-canonical MAPs-encoding RNA expression in malignant and benign cells is critical for identifying tumor antigens (TAs) but represents a challenge for immunologists. We present BamQuery, a computational tool attributing an exhaustive RNA expression to MAPs of any origin (exon, intron, UTR, intergenic) from bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data. We show that non-canonical MAPs (including TAs) can derive from multiple different genomic regions (up to 35,343 for EREs), abundantly expressed in normal tissues. We also show that supposedly tumor-specific mutated MAPs, viral MAPs, and MAPs derived from proteasomal splicing can arise from different unmutated non-canonical genomic regions. The genome-wide approach of BamQuery allows comprehensive mapping of all MAPs in healthy and cancer tissues. BamQuery can also help predict MAP immunogenicity and identify safe and actionable TAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".