MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303700159 · doi:10.5539/apr.v14n2p29

Characterization of Dark Energy and Derivation of Hubble’s Constant Using Harmonic Quintessence

2022· article· en· W4303700159 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Andrew Worsley, James F. Peters, Joseph Worsley

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuintessenceDark energyPhysicsPlanckCosmological constantHubble's lawDark fluidQuantum electrodynamicsAstrophysicsClassical mechanicsCosmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, using harmonic quintessence, it is shown that the fundamental parameterization of dark energy can be determined using Planck’s constant. This allows the derivation of the mass density, and in turn we obtain the energy density of dark energy. This characterization of dark energy also allows the derivation of an averaged value of Hubble’s constant, which is in keeping with results from the Planck telescope. It is also possible to confirm the vacuum electric permittivity, magnetic permeability and the field equations for dark energy and corroborate the continued expansion of the Universe. This establishes the fundamental element of the Universe, derived from Planck’s constant, as Harmonic Quintessence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207