Development of a Model for Spoofing Attacks in Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) allows the integration of the physical world with network devices for proper privacy and security in a healthcare system. IoT in a healthcare system is vulnerable to spoofing attacks that can easily represent themselves as a legal entity of the network. It is a passive attack and can access the Medium Access Control address of some valid users in the network to continue malicious activities. In this paper, an algorithm is proposed for detecting spoofing attacks in IoT using Received Signal Strength (RSS) and Number of Connected Neighbors (NCN). Firstly, the spoofing attack is detected, located and eliminated through Received Signal Strength (RSS) in an inter-cluster network. However, the RSS is not useful against intra-cluster spoofing attacks and therefore the NCN is introduced to detect, identify and eliminate the intra-cluster spoofing attack. The proposed model is implemented in Network Simulator 2 (NS-2) to compare the performance of the proposed algorithm in the presence and absence of spoofing attacks. The result is that the proposed model increases the detection and prevention of spoofing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".