MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303984309 · doi:10.12775/sdr.2022.1.05

Afera „Pocisk” (1935–1936): preludium do afery Rana

2022· article· pl· W4303984309 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Kuśnierz

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej · 2022
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poniższy artykuł ukazuje nieznaną w historiografii historię nawiązania przez polski wywiad wojskowy współpracy oraz jej przebiegu z Hansem Wieserem – niemieckim inżynierem, balistykiem pracującym w Związku Sowieckim, który okazał się sowieckim agentem. Współpraca z Wieserem przybrała kryptonim „Pocisk”. Dzięki Wieserowi sowiecki kontrwywiad przyłapał na gorącym uczynku polskiego agenta wywiadu wojskowego, por. Stefana Kasperskiego (Alberta Rana), w momencie odbierania przezeń materiału szpiegowskiego. W ten sposób doszło do największej wpadki polskiego wywiadu wojskowego operującego w Związku Sowieckim w latach trzydziestych XX w.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-WschodniejSame topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207