MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304183975 · doi:10.1080/20511787.2022.2067385

Quilting Space: Experimental Form-Finding with Knitted Fabrics

2022· article· en· W4304183975 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Textile Design Research and Practice · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityNottingham Trent University
KeywordsProcess (computing)TextileArchitectural engineeringQuiltingArchitectureSet (abstract data type)EngineeringComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)ExploitEngineering drawingConstruction engineeringMechanical engineeringVisual artsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper outlines an ongoing project exploring the potential for knitted textiles to create architectural forms. The project is inspired by the processes of the engineer Heinz Isler who used textiles as a form-finding medium and subsequently set those forms into permanent structures, using the knowledge acquired during that process to create large scale forms inspired by the maquettes. This project examines how this approach could be explored using a textile design route and incorporating knowledge of the textile design process as both a technical and aesthetic act. The first part uses a collaborative workshop to transform tubular-knitted fabric into small and large sculptural models. These are then recontextualised with a focus on photographic output to present the outcomes as architectural forms. Second, thermoplastic polyurethane yarn (TPUY) is used to create knitted structures that exploit the innate potentials of knitted fabrics when used with heating methods to find forms to create architectural maquettes. These knitted structures are created on electronic Stoll knitting machinery and rely on tacit knit knowledge to create structures that capitalise on the adaptability of the knitting process. This reduces the need for seams or other areas that may cause weakness and allows the creation of both flat and three-dimensional shapes. Using various techniques, concentrations of TPUY and conventional knitting fibres, the project proposes an exciting future application for knitted textiles in the process of designing structures with potential in architecture, engineering and sculpture. Finally, the discussion moves to further potentials for this process in both research and teaching scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it