MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304474529 · doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000002505

Porcine Model of Acute Compartment Syndrome

2022· article· en· W4304474529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMuscle and Compartmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCompartment (ship)Intensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Acute compartment syndrome is a devastating condition associated with lasting consequences or even death if not treated in a timely fashion. Current preclinical modeling is inadequate. Ideally a model should mimic human disease. There should be a trauma-induced reperfusion or direct muscle event that causes gradual increased pressure and is amenable to release with fasciotomy. We have attempted to reproduce this mechanism and outcome in a porcine model. METHODS: Anterior tibial musculature was injured with vascular occlusion plus exterior tourniquet crush or direct intracompartmental crush through balloon inflation. The injury was maintained for over 5 hours. At that time, the tourniquet or balloon was removed. The injuries were continuously monitored with an intramuscular continuous pressure sensor. Pressure changes were recorded and after 2 hours of postinjury observation, a fasciotomy was performed for the muscle compartment. RESULTS: Pressures were brought to 100 mm Hg during the injury phase. During the two-hour observation period, the balloon catheter technique achieved an average pressure of 25.1 ± SD 8.8 mm Hg with a maximum reading of 38.2 mm Hg and minimum reading of 14.1 mm Hg. During this same period, the ischemia-reperfusion + direct crush technique achieved an average pressure of 33.7 ± SD 7.3 mm Hg, with a maximum reading of 43.5 mm Hg and minimum reading of 23.5 mm Hg. Average pressure postfasciotomy for the balloon catheter technique was 2.4 ± SD 2.5 mm Hg; and for the crush technique, average value postfasciotomy was 4.9 ± SD 3.7 mm Hg-both representing a return to physiologic levels. CONCLUSION: This is the first preclinical model that shows the same response to injury and treatment as is observed in human physiology. Surgical and nonsurgical therapies for compartment syndrome can now be tested reliably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it