MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4304479781 · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvac130

Addressing global disparities in blood pressure control: perspectives of the International Society of Hypertension

2022· article· en· W4304479781 on OpenAlexaff
Aletta E. Schutte, Tazeen H. Jafar, Neil R Poulter, Albertino Damasceno, Nadia Khan, Peter M. Nilsson, Jafar Alsaid, Dinesh Neupane, Kazuomi Kario, Hind Beheiry, Sofie Brouwers, Dylan Burger, Fadi J. Charchar, Myeong‐Chan Cho, Tomasz J. Guzik, Ghazi F Haji Al-Saedi, Muhammad Ishaq, Hiroshi Itoh, Erika Jones, Taskeen Khan, Yoshihiro Kokubo, Praew Kotruchin, Elizabeth Silaid Muxfeldt, Augustine N. Odili, Mansi Patil, Udaya Ralapanawa, César A. Romero, Markus P. Schlaich, Abdulla Shehab, Siew Mooi Ching, U. Muscha Steckelings, George S. Stergiou, Rhian M. Touyz, Thomas Unger, Richard D. Wainford, Ji‐Guang Wang, Bryan Williams, Brandi M. Wynne, Maciej Tomaszewski

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of OttawaCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesOttawa HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNational Health and Medical Research CouncilBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMedicineGlobal healthDevelopment economicsHealth equityEconomic growthBlood pressureEnvironmental healthHealth careUnemploymentPovertyPublic healthGerontologyIntensive care medicineEconomicsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations138
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular Research→Same topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies→French-language works237,207→