Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank BNI Syariah Dan Bank BRI Syariah Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Financial performance as a measuring tool to determine the process of implementing financial resources owned by the company. The Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on the banking sector, resulting in non-current financing due to debtor arrears as a result of many people losing their jobs and difficulties in paying financing. This study has the aim of conducting a comparative analysis of financial performance between BRI Syariah Banks and BNI Syariah Banks during the Covid-19 pandemic, using financial report notes for quarter 1, 2, 3 and 4 for 2019, quarter 1 for 2020 through independent testing. Sample T-Test. There is a difference between the financial performance of Bank BNI Syariah and Bank BRI Syariah from the aspect of ROA, NPF and BOPO, while from the aspect of CAR and ROE it shows that there is no significant difference between the financial performance of BRI Syariah Bank and BNI Syariah Bank. This paper recommends to BNI Syariah to pay attention to the ROE and NPF ratios, while to BRI Syariah Banks to pay attention to the CAR, ROA and BOPO ratios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it