MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304606961 · doi:10.3917/ri.191.0065

La monnaie d’invasion et la libération de la France

2022· article· fr· W4304606961 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth Mouré

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations internationales · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lors de leurs préparatifs pour libérer l’Europe, les alliés prirent des décisions concernant la monnaie dont seraient pourvus les militaires pour leurs achats dans les zones de combat et le rétablissement d’un ordre monétaire dans les régions libérées. Quant à la France, les chefs alliés s’opposaient à la reconnaissance officielle de Charles de Gaulle et du CFLN, bien qu’ils représentassent la seule autorité compétente pour gérer les affaires civiles dans les zones libérées. Les Alliés ont donc débarqué en Normandie avec des Allied Military francs , imprimés aux États-Unis et autorisés par le général Eisenhower, mais de Gaulle a qualifié ces billets de « fausse monnaie ». Ce conflit montre combien la souveraineté monétaire était un attribut fondamental de la souveraineté nationale au moment de libération.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations internationalesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207