NBR/CR‐Based High‐Damping Rubber Composites Containing Multiscale Structures for Tailoring Sound Insulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High‐damping acoustic composites with unique sound insulation feature is reported, demonstrating surprisingly stable soundproof properties over a wide bandwidth of frequency (63–6300 Hz) with good mechanical properties. The extraordinary acoustic properties are attributed to the multiscale synergy of lamellar and hollow structures by multifillers adding. The acoustic composites are designed and fabricated through a low‐temperature one‐time rubber mixing process using nitrile butadiene rubber(NBR), chloroprene rubber (CR) as matrix and mica powder (MP), hollow glass beads (HGB), and montmorillonite (MMT) as multifillers. The soundproof mechanism is discussed in detail. Results indicate that the synergism of damping and sound absorption behaviors in the composition has a considerable impact on the acoustic characteristics, which can be controlled by the blending ratio of NBR/CR matrixes and the multiscale structures of MP/HGB/MMT multifillers. The designed multifillers acoustic composites can adapt to broadband engineering noise control including walls in express train constructions, panels of vessel or aircraft cabins, and large transportation pipelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".