MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D Excavator Pose Estimation Using Projection-Based Pose Optimization for Contact-Driven Hazard Monitoring

2022· article· en· W4304617234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavatorPose3D pose estimationKinematicsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceProjection (relational algebra)MonocularEngineeringArticulated body pose estimationAlgorithmMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contact-driven accidents involving actuated excavators have led to a significant number of fatalities in the construction industry. The revolving mechanical arm of excavators poses a major risk of contact-driven accidents for workers in its proximity due to its articulated pose. Detecting the 3D pose of excavator arms is thus essential to prevent contact-driven accidents near excavators. Previous works have attempted to estimate 3D excavator poses using sensor-based or computer vision-based methods. However, existing methods require extensive preparation work, such as attaching physical sensors, calibrating stereo cameras, or collecting 3D training data. As a result, existing methods cannot be easily integrated into the current construction workflow and are seldom applied in real-world situations. The authors propose a projection-based 3D pose optimization method that utilizes excavator kinematic constraints to infer 3D excavator poses from monocular image sequences with no dependency on 3D training data. The proposed method first extracts the 2D excavator pose from images using a keypoint region-based convolution neural network. Then, the 2D pose is reconstructed into 3D by enforcing the rigid excavator kinematic constraints (e.g., arm length) and minimizing the 2D reprojection error of the excavator pose. Tests using a 1:14 miniature excavator model showed a 3D position error of 7.3 cm (or 1.03 m when scaled up to real-world dimensions) for keypoints on the excavator pose, demonstrating the capabilities of the proposed method in estimating 3D excavator poses from monocular images. The proximity measuring capacity of the estimated 3D pose was also evaluated, achieving a mean absolute distance error of 4.7 cm (or 0.66 m scaled). The proposed method offers a 3D excavator pose estimation method using only a monocular camera and without relying on 3D training data. The estimated 3D excavator pose enables safety managers to monitor potential contact-driven accidents near excavators and alert workers of unsafe situations and promotes safer working environments for construction workers near excavators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it