MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304630412 · doi:10.1101/2022.10.11.511783

Zasp52 strengthens whole embryo tissue integrity through supracellular actomyosin networks

2022· preprint· en· W4304630412 on OpenAlexafffund
Dina J. Ashour, Clinton H. Durney, Vicente J. Planelles-Herrero, Tim J. Stevens, James J. Feng, Katja Röper

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsCell biologyEmbryoMorphogenesisActinChemistryPrimordiumEmbryonic stem cellEmbryogenesisBiologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During morphogenesis, large scale changes of tissue primordia occur that are all coordinated across an embryo. In Drosophila , several tissue primordia and embryonic regions are bordered or encircled by supracellular actomyosin cables, junctional actomyosin enrichments networked between many neighbouring cells. We show that the single Drosophila Alp/Enigma family protein Zasp52, which is most prominently found in Z-discs of muscles, is a component of many supracellular actomyosin structures during embryogenesis, including the ventral midline and the boundary of the salivary gland placode. Zasp52, we uncover, contains within its central coiled-coil region a type of actin-binding motif usually found in CapZbeta proteins, and this domain displays actin binding activity. Using endogenously-tagged lines we identify that Zasp52 interacts with a subset of junctional components, including APC2, Polychaetoid/ZO-1, and Sidekick, as well as actomyosin regulators. Analysis of zasp52 mutant embryos revealed that the severity of the embryonic defects observed scales inversely with the amount of functional protein left. Large tissue deformations occur at sites where actomyosin cables are found during embryogenesis, suggesting a model whereby supracellular cables containing Zasp52 aid to insulate morphogenetic changes from one another. This is further supported by the analysis of in vivo processes as well as by an in silico vertex model of morphogenetic domains separated by a stiffness boundary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207