Adapting the Exploration–Exploitation Balance in Heterogeneous Swarms: Tracking Evasive Targets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been growing interest in the use of multi-robot systems in various tasks and scenarios. The main attractiveness of such systems is their flexibility, robustness, and scalability. An often overlooked yet promising feature is system modularity, which offers the possibility of harnessing agent specialization, while also enabling system-level upgrades. However, altering the agents' capacities can change the exploration-exploitation balance required to maximize the system's performance. Here, we study the effect of a swarm's heterogeneity on its exploration-exploitation balance while tracking multiple fast-moving evasive targets under the cooperative multi-robot observation of multiple moving targets framework. To this end, we use a decentralized search and tracking strategy with adjustable levels of exploration and exploitation. By indirectly tuning the balance, we first confirm the presence of an optimal balance between these two key competing actions. Next, by substituting slower moving agents with faster ones, we show that the system exhibits a performance improvement without any modifications to the original strategy. In addition, owing to the additional amount of exploitation carried out by the faster agents, we demonstrate that a heterogeneous system's performance can be further improved by reducing an agent's level of connectivity, to favor the conduct of exploratory actions. Furthermore, in studying the influence of the density of swarming agents, we show that the addition of faster agents can counterbalance a reduction in the overall number of agents while maintaining the level of tracking performance. Finally, we explore the challenges of using differentiated strategies to take advantage of the heterogeneous nature of the swarm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".