MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4304695092 · doi:10.1113/jp283133

Particle‐swarm based modelling reveals two distinct classes of CRH <sup>PVN</sup> neurons

2022· article· en· W4304695092 on OpenAlexafffund
Ewandson L. Lameu, Neilen P. Rasiah, Dinara Baimoukhametova, Spencer P. Loewen, Jaideep S. Bains, Wilten Nicola

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
KeywordsBurstingNeuroscienceElectrophysiologyPhysicsNeuronBiological systemComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Electrophysiological recordings can provide detailed information of single neurons’ dynamical features and shed light on their response to stimuli. Unfortunately, rapidly modelling electrophysiological data for inferring network‐level behaviours remains challenging. Here, we investigate how modelled single neuron dynamics leads to network‐level responses in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN), a critical nucleus for the mammalian stress response. Recordings of corticotropin releasing hormone neurons from the PVN (CRH PVN ) were performed using whole‐cell current‐clamp. These, neurons, which initiate the endocrine response to stress, were rapidly and automatically fit to a modified adaptive exponential integrate‐and‐fire model (AdEx) with particle swarm optimization (PSO). All CRH PVN neurons were accurately fit by the AdEx model with PSO. Multiple sets of parameters were found that reliably reproduced current‐clamp traces for any single neuron. Despite multiple solutions, the dynamical features of the models such as the rheobase, fixed points, and bifurcations, were shown to be stable across fits. We found that CRH PVN neurons can be divided into two subtypes according to their bifurcation at the onset of firing: CRH PVN ‐integrators and CRH PVN ‐resonators. The existence of CRH PVN ‐resonators was then directly confirmed in a follow‐up patch‐clamp hyperpolarization protocol which readily induced post‐inhibitory rebound spiking in 33% of patched neurons. We constructed networks of CRH PVN model neurons to investigate the network level responses of CRH PVN neurons. We found that CRH PVN ‐resonators maintain baseline firing in networks even when all inputs are inhibitory. The dynamics of a small subset of CRH PVN neurons may be critical to maintaining a baseline firing tone in the PVN. image Key points Corticotropin‐releasing hormone neurons (CRH PVN ) in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus act as the final neural controllers of the stress response. We developed a computational modelling platform that uses particle swarm optimization to rapidly and accurately fit biophysical neuron models to patched CRH PVN neurons. A model was fitted to each patched neuron without the use of dynamic clamping, or other procedures requiring sophisticated inputs and fitting algorithms. Any neuron undergoing standard current clamp step protocols for a few minutes can be fitted by this procedure The dynamical analysis of the modelled neurons shows that CRH PVN neurons come in two specific ‘flavours’: CRH PVN ‐resonators and CRH PVN ‐integrators. We directly confirmed the existence of these two classes of CRH PVN neurons in subsequent experiments. Network simulations show that CRH PVN ‐resonators are critical to retaining the baseline firing rate of the entire network of CRH PVN neurons as these cells can fire rebound spikes and bursts in the presence of strong inhibitory synaptic input.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physiology→Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→