MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304698083 · doi:10.47191/afmj/v7i10.01

The Working Poor in Serbia, 2006-2022

2022· article· en· W4304698083 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marija Obradović

Bibliographic record

VenueAccount and Financial Management Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimum wageRecessionWorking classPovertyCost of livingUnemploymentWorking poorEconomicsStandard of livingValue (mathematics)WageLabour economicsGovernment (linguistics)BusinessDevelopment economicsMarket economyEconomic growthPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 pandemic crisis enlarged „new “poverty among the working class what is a far-reaching consequences of the processes of globalization and privatization, especially in the USA, Canada and Europe. During COVID-19 pandemic crisis a lot of the workers lost their jobs. Others faced decline of the wages due to downturn in the global economy. „New“ poverty among the working class is particularly widespread in Eastern Europe as a result of privatization of state property and pauperization of the working class. The main issue of our paper is to analyze a link between the policy of flexible labor market and phenomenon of „new “poverty among the working class in Serbia. We explore the living standard of the working families in conditions of increased cost of living and the expansion of number of the workers that earn the minimum wage (400,000 persons, 20% of employees) in Serbia during COVID- 19 pandemic crisis. We examine the value and the content of the minimum consumer goods basket and the amount of the minimum wage. The amount of the minimum price of labor per working hour in Serbia for 2022 has not been determined by the Social and Economic Council of the Republic of Serbia. The decision on the amount of the minimum price of labor has been made by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, as it used to in previous years. The minimum cost of labor for 2022 is only 89% of the value of the minimum consumer basket.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccount and Financial Management JournalSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207