BCS Theory in the Weak Magnetic Field Regime for Systems with Nonzero Flux and Exponential Estimates on the Adiabatic Theorem in Extended Quantum Lattice Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the main part of this PhD thesis, we consider a periodically realized microscopic superconductor described by BCS theory, which is subject to external electromagnetic fields. We show that the superconductor is properly described by Ginzburg--Landau theory in the macroscopic and weak magnetic field limit. The main novelty of our results is to allow for a non-vanishing magnetic flux through the unit cell of the lattice of periodicity. These main results are supplemented by various unpublished notes in the field of BCS theory. Furthermore, we preface the presentation of these results with a comprehensive introduction suitable for master's or PhD students. Thereby, we hope to contribute to filling the gap of missing introductory literature in the field. The thesis comprises a second topic, in which we provide ideas for setting up quantum lattice systems in order to prove exponential estimates for the adiabatic theorem. These notes are the result of studies in this field, which have been conducted during a research stay at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Vancouver, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".