Age-dependent effect of insulin in the regulation of intracellular calcium in ventricular cardiomyocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we wanted to verify whether the effect of insulin on calcium homeostasis depends on the heart's development stage. Using a quantitative 3D confocal microscopy, we tested the effect of a high insulin concentration (100 µU) in freshly cultured ventricular cardiomyocytes from newborn and adult rats. Our results showed that the cytosolic basal level of calcium was higher in newborn cardiomyocytes with no change in the nuclear basal calcium level compared with the adult cardiomyocytes; in addition, insulin induced a slow increase of cytosolic and nuclear calcium in newborn ventricular cardiomyocytes, followed by two phases. However, the first phase of slow cytosolic and nuclear calcium increase was absent in adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, the time to the onset of increase of cytosolic and nuclear calcium was longer in newborn cardiomyocytes compared with adults. Moreover, the time to peak of the calcium transient was shorter in newborns than in adult cardiomyocytes. These results demonstrate that insulin differently regulates calcium homeostasis in newborns than in adult cardiomyocytes. Thus, newborn rat cardiomyocytes, commonly used in research as a model for adult cardiomyocytes, should be used with caution when dealing with insulin in normal and disease conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".