Fast and Stable Approximation of Analytic Functions from Equispaced Samples via Polynomial Frames
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We consider approximating analytic functions on the interval $$[-1,1]$$ [ - 1 , 1 ] from their values at a set of $$m+1$$ m + 1 equispaced nodes. A result of Platte, Trefethen & Kuijlaars states that fast and stable approximation from equispaced samples is generally impossible. In particular, any method that converges exponentially fast must also be exponentially ill-conditioned. We prove a positive counterpart to this ‘impossibility’ theorem. Our ‘possibility’ theorem shows that there is a well-conditioned method that provides exponential decay of the error down to a finite, but user-controlled tolerance $$\epsilon > 0$$ ϵ > 0 , which in practice can be chosen close to machine epsilon. The method is known as polynomial frame approximation or polynomial extensions. It uses algebraic polynomials of degree n on an extended interval $$[-\gamma ,\gamma ]$$ [ - γ , γ ] , $$\gamma > 1$$ γ > 1 , to construct an approximation on $$[-1,1]$$ [ - 1 , 1 ] via a SVD-regularized least-squares fit. A key step in the proof of our main theorem is a new result on the maximal behaviour of a polynomial of degree n on $$[-1,1]$$ [ - 1 , 1 ] that is simultaneously bounded by one at a set of $$m+1$$ m + 1 equispaced nodes in $$[-1,1]$$ [ - 1 , 1 ] and $$1/\epsilon $$ 1 / ϵ on the extended interval $$[-\gamma ,\gamma ]$$ [ - γ , γ ] . We show that linear oversampling, i.e. $$m = c n \log (1/\epsilon ) / \sqrt{\gamma ^2-1}$$ m = c n log ( 1 / ϵ ) / γ 2 - 1 , is sufficient for uniform boundedness of any such polynomial on $$[-1,1]$$ [ - 1 , 1 ] . This result aside, we also prove an extended impossibility theorem, which shows that such a possibility theorem (and consequently the method of polynomial frame approximation) is essentially optimal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".