MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304789885 · doi:10.54097/hset.v14i.1843

Virus vaccines in cancer immunotherapy: Principles, and Clinical manifestations

2022· article· en· W4304789885 on OpenAlexaff
Yanning Li

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Science Engineering and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmunotherapyVaccinationCancer immunotherapyCancerCancer vaccineCancer treatmentImmunologyVirusVirologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immunotherapy has been of extraordinary significance in cancer treatment. There are many cancer vaccines, and viral vaccines are one type of cancer vaccine. Viral vaccines provide an encouraging solution for the treatment of solid tumors, which cannot be achieved by traditional therapies. Cancer therapy and prevention rely on the availability of virus vaccinations. Existing cancer vaccines have had remarkable success in treatment and prevention. This article summarizes several feasible cancer vaccines and their clinical applications, and analyzes the current limitations and future development of viral vaccines. This article's summary of virus vaccines can provide a helpful reference for future cancer vaccine research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Science Engineering and TechnologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207