Modeling Heat Transfer through Permafrost Soil Subjected to Seasonal Freeze-Thaw
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present paper proposes an iterative implicit numerical method for simulating the thaw depth of permafrost soil. For this purpose, the enthalpy-porosity model was used for the phase change process, and the finite difference scheme FTCS (Forward Time Centered Space) was used for discretization. An artificial mushy zone was maintained with the same thickness by keeping the regularization parameter proportional to the temperature gradient. In doing so, we made the scheme more stable and convergence occurred faster. The model accuracy was validated by comparing the numerical results with the analytical Stefan solution and with the results of a derived numerical model, based on an explicit scheme. The model performance was also tested against observation data collected on four different landscapes with different soil profiles and located on a basin underlain by continuous permafrost. It was found that the proposed model matched noticeably well the analytical solution for a volumetric liquid fraction (phi) equal to 0.5 regardless of the grid resolution. Furthermore, compared with the observation data, the model reproduced the annual maximum thaw depth with an absolute error lying between 0.7 and 7.7%. In addition, the designed algorithm allowed the model to converge after a maximum of eight iterations, reducing the computational time by around 75% compared to the explicit model. The results were so encouraging that the model can be included in a hydrological modeling of permafrost watersheds or cold regions in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".