The Impact of Covid-19 on the US Stock Market: Evidence from Time Series Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we conduct a time series analysis of the US stock market’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Using both US and global daily COVID-19 newly confirmed cases and stock market returns data represented by Nasdaq, S&P 500, and Dow Jones over the period 31 December 2019 to 30 December 2021, we examine a time-series impact of COVID-19 on the US stock market. We employ our input into a vector autoregression model (VAR) and ARMA-GARCH model to characterize the dynamic relationship between both domestic and global COVID-19 infections and the performance of the US stock market. The findings show that COVID-19 has an initial negative shock on the stock market with large volatility clustering within 60 days after the initial pandemic outbreak. After around 200 to 300 days, the number of new COVID-19 cases per day does not have a statistically significant impact on the US stock market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".