MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304816537 · doi:10.3390/iecma2022-12903

A Real-Time Estimation Method of Soil-Bucket Interaction of an Autonomous Excavator via Marching Cube and Constructive Solid Geometry Methods

2022· article· en· W4304816537 on OpenAlexaff
Fattah Hanafi Sheikhha, Jaho Seo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavatorCube (algebra)ConstructiveProcess (computing)DiggingComputer scienceMarching cubesSoftwareSimple (philosophy)AlgorithmGeometryMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceVisualizationStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a combination of marching cubes and the constructive solid geometry method were merged to develop a simple, fast, and accurate method to estimate the shape of the soil in addition to the volume of the soil in the bucket during the digging process of an autonomous excavator. A simulation test was designed to verify the proposed method. The result of the implemented software simulation was compared with the analytical solution to validate the accuracy of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle DynamicsFrench-language works237,207