MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304889886 · doi:10.1142/s0218127422501863

A Chaotic Image Encryption Scheme Based on Genetic Central Dogma and KMP Method

2022· article· en· W4304889886 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEncryptionCryptosystemChaoticPixelPermutation (music)String (physics)AlgorithmComputer scienceImage (mathematics)CryptanalysisReplication (statistics)EmbeddingTheoretical computer scienceCryptographyMathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an image cryptosystem based on genetic central dogma (GCD), Knuth–Morria–Pratt (KMP) algorithm and a chaotic system is developed. The KMP algorithm is firstly used to bind DNA strings to obtain the next array, which participates in the design of the chaotic initial condition, and then the secure chaotic sequences are produced by employing the sliding idea in pattern string matching. In the present procedure, a DNA-level two-way pixel’s shuffle is achieved by a shared stack push operation and it is adopted in the permutation module for the purpose of accelerating the overall pixel’s shuffle. Subsequently, the pixel values are substituted by simulating the process of protein synthesis in GCD, in which the DNA replication and RNA replication form the basis of the DNA-triploid mutation and new RNA mutation rules, respectively. Experimental simulations and extensive cryptanalysis fully vindicate that superior security effects in addition to satisfactory low time complexity can be simultaneously obtained by the proposed confusion-substitution scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it