A Chaotic Image Encryption Scheme Based on Genetic Central Dogma and KMP Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, an image cryptosystem based on genetic central dogma (GCD), Knuth–Morria–Pratt (KMP) algorithm and a chaotic system is developed. The KMP algorithm is firstly used to bind DNA strings to obtain the next array, which participates in the design of the chaotic initial condition, and then the secure chaotic sequences are produced by employing the sliding idea in pattern string matching. In the present procedure, a DNA-level two-way pixel’s shuffle is achieved by a shared stack push operation and it is adopted in the permutation module for the purpose of accelerating the overall pixel’s shuffle. Subsequently, the pixel values are substituted by simulating the process of protein synthesis in GCD, in which the DNA replication and RNA replication form the basis of the DNA-triploid mutation and new RNA mutation rules, respectively. Experimental simulations and extensive cryptanalysis fully vindicate that superior security effects in addition to satisfactory low time complexity can be simultaneously obtained by the proposed confusion-substitution scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".