Newly formed place cells are stabilized by coordinated population activity during REM sleep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The involvement of rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMs) in spatial memory formation was recently demonstrated, although how neural activity during REMs influences newly-formed place field stability remains unclear. Here, we combined large-scale single-unit recordings of mouse hippocampal CA1 with an established optogenetic approach enabling REMs-selective inhibition of medial septum GABAergic neurons (MSGABA), resulting in spatial memory deficits when applied post-learning. Although individual neural activity was unaffected by REMs-selective MSGABA inhibition during a post-learning rest session, both the synchrony of population-level activity bursts observed during REMs occurring in the rest session and place field stability measured during subsequent memory recall testing were reduced vs controls. However, the latter effect was limited to place cells participating in population activity during REMs, as stability of non-participant place cells was relatively weak and indifferent between groups. This suggests that synchronous CA1 population activity during REMs stabilizes spatial representations in a plastic subpopulation of participating CA1 neurons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".