MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Magnetic Flux Analysis Of Synchronous Machines With Salient Poles

2022· article· en· W4306148165 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Bernier, Olivier Kokoko, Arezki Merkhouf, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorMagnetic fluxMagnetic circuitPermanent magnet synchronous generatorAir gap (plumbing)Magnetic fieldMagnetic reluctanceRotor (electric)Voltage dropControl theory (sociology)SalientElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMechanicsPhysicsVoltageMagnetMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper compares the pole drop test and magnetic flux measurement approach for large hydro generator to diagnosis any rotor short circuit in large hydro generator. The pole drop test was conducted according to the IEEE standards. Three different algorithms have been used to analyze the air gap magnetic field obtained from the measurement obtained by the inductive probe installed in the stator bore. The proposed algorithms based of the magnetic flux values of each pole are also used to diagnose inter turns short circuit. The advantages and limitations of the algorithms were explained and compared to the results of the pole drop test on a large hydrogenerator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM)Same topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207