Crop Classification and Representative Crop Rotation Identifying Using Statistical Features of Time-Series Sentinel-1 GRD Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared with a monoculture planting mode, the practice of crop rotations improves fertilizer efficiency and increases crop yield. Large-scale crop rotation monitoring relies on the results of crop classification using remote sensing technology. However, the limited crop classification accuracy cannot satisfy the accurate identification of crop rotation patterns. In this paper, a crop classification and rotation mapping scheme combining the random forest (RF) algorithm and new statistical features extracted from time-series ground range direction (GRD) Sentinel-1 images. First, the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) time-series stacks are established, including VH, VV, and VH/VV channels. Then, new statistical features named the objected generalized gamma distribution (OGΓD) features are introduced to compare with other object-based features for each polarization. The results showed that the OGΓD σVH achieved 96.66% of the overall accuracy (OA) and 95.34% of the Kappa, improving around 4% and 6% compared with the object-based backscatter in VH polarization, respectively. Finally, annual crop-type maps for five consecutive years (2017–2021) are generated using the OGΓD σVH and the RF. By analyzing the five-year crop sequences, the soybean-corn (corn-soybean) is the most representative rotation in the study region, and the soybean-corn-soybean-corn-soybean (together with corn-soybean-corn-soybean-corn) has the highest count with 100 occurrences (25.20% of the total area). This study offers new insights into crop rotation monitoring, giving the basic data for government food planning decision-making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".