Dynamic Ensemble Size Adjustment for Memory Constrained Mondrian Forest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supervised learning algorithms generally assume the availability of enough memory to store data models during the training and test phases. However, this assumption is unrealistic when data comes in the form of infinite data streams, or when learning algorithms are deployed on devices with reduced amounts of memory. Such memory constraints impact the model behavior and assumptions. In this paper, we show that under memory constraints, increasing the size of a tree-based ensemble classifier can worsen its performance. In particular, we experimentally show the existence of an optimal ensemble size for a memory-bounded Mondrian forest on data streams and we design an algorithm to guide the forest toward that optimal number by using an estimation of overfitting. We tested different variations for this algorithm on a variety of real and simulated datasets, and we conclude that our method can achieve up to 95% of the performance of an optimally-sized Mondrian forest for stable datasets, and can even outperform it for datasets with concept drifts. All our methods are implemented in the OrpailleCC open-source library and are ready to be used on embedded systems and connected objects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".