MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306247017 · doi:10.1093/fmls/cqac039

Individual and Societal Shortcomings in Eighteenth-Century German Comedy: A Reassessment

2022· article· en· W4306247017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueForum for Modern Language Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComedyGermanCriticismBlameGerman literatureLiteratureSocial criticismArgument (complex analysis)PhilosophySociologyHistoryLawArtPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyLinguisticsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To what extent do comedies place the blame for vicious behaviour on the individuals who fail to comply with the norms of their society, or on the structures of society in which individuals act? The traditional understanding is that the moral-philosophical critique of individual behaviour in older comedy was supplanted by social criticism in newer comedy. This article revisits the history of comedy to emphasize the very gradual nature of this development and to shed light on the nuances in the distinction between the critique of individuals and the critique of social structures. The argument is developed through an exemplary analysis of four German-language plays from the eighteenth century: the comedies Die ungleiche Heirath (1743) by Luise Gottsched, Der geschäfftige Müssiggänger (1743) by Johann Elias Schlegel, and Die Soldaten (1776) by J. M. R. Lenz, as well as the farce Voltaire am Abend seiner Apotheose (1778) by Heinrich Leopold Wagner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it