MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Direct Measurement of Resonances in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> Relevant to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math>-Process Nucleosynthesis

2022· article· lv· W4306252986 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Psaltis, A. A. Chen, R. Longland, D. Connolly, C. R. Brune, B. Davids, J. Fallis, R. Giri, U. Greife, D.A. Hutcheon, L. Kroll, A. Lennarz, J. F. Liang, M. Lovely, Monica Luo, Caleb Marshall, S. N. Paneru, A. Parikh, C. Ruiz, A.C. Shotter, M. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMFNorth Island CollegeSimon Fraser UniversityMcMaster University
FundersNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of EnergyAustralian GovernmentTRIUMFDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftColorado School of MinesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNucleosynthesisPhysicsSupernovaNeutrinoResonance (particle physics)Nuclear physicsNuclear reactionAtomic physicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have performed the first direct measurement of two resonances of the $^{7}\mathrm{Be}(\ensuremath{\alpha},\ensuremath{\gamma})^{11}\mathrm{C}$ reaction with unknown strengths using an intense radioactive $^{7}\mathrm{Be}$ beam and the DRAGON recoil separator. We report on the first measurement of the 1155 and 1110 keV resonance strengths of $1.73\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.25(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.40(\mathrm{syst})\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ and ${125}_{\ensuremath{-}25}^{+27}(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}15(\mathrm{syst})\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{meV}$, respectively. The present results have reduced the uncertainty in the $^{7}\mathrm{Be}(\ensuremath{\alpha},\ensuremath{\gamma})^{11}\mathrm{C}$ reaction rate to $\ensuremath{\sim}9.4%--10.7%$ over $T=1.5--3\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GK}$, which is relevant for nucleosynthesis in the neutrino-driven outflows of core-collapse supernovae ($\ensuremath{\nu}p$ process). We find no effect of the new, constrained reaction rate on $\ensuremath{\nu}p$-process nucleosynthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.009
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0110.012
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4380.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207