MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306317651 · doi:10.36198/9783838588117

Familienrechtspsychologie

2022· book· de· W4306317651 on OpenAlexaff
Harry Dettenborn, Eginhard Walter

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagede
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology, Coaching, and Therapy
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPolitical scienceGynecologyHumanitiesMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Das Standardlehrbuch zur Familienrechtspsychologie vollständig überarbeitet und erweitert. Wenn familiäre Konflikte vor Gericht gelöst werden müssen, ist psychologische Kompetenz für alle beteiligten Berufsgruppen unverzichtbar. Das vorliegende Buch macht den Leser vertraut mit den rechtlichen Grundlagen und der psychologischen Tragweite einzelner Konfliktthemen wie Sorgerecht, Umgangsrecht, Adoption oder Herausnahme von Kindern aus der Familie. Es zeigt anschaulich, wie diese theoretischen Grundkenntnisse in die Praxis der Jugendhilfe, Verfahrenspflege, Beratung und Gutachtertätigkeit eingebracht werden können.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPsychology, Coaching, and TherapyFrench-language works237,207