MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306353437 · doi:10.56588/iabcd.v1i2.50

PHYTOCHEMICAL PROFILE OF THE LATEX EXTRACTS OF CALOTROPIS PROCERA (AITON) DRYAND

2022· article· en· W4306353437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Association of Biologicals and Computational Digest · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalotropis proceraPhytochemicalTraditional medicineProceraSolventChemistryMethanolBotanyBiologyMedicineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calotropis procera (Aiton) Dryand. is a medicinal plant whose pharmacological properties are associated with its latex. In present study, aqueous and methanolic extracts of the latex were evaluated in an attempt to trace the presence of phytochemicals. The crude latex was diluted in the ratio of 1:10. The results revealed that some phytochemicals exhibited their presence in the aqueous solvent whereas some displayed their presence in the methanol. These findings provide an explanation for the use of different solvents in the experiments of phytochemical screenings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it