To the Question of the significance of the soviet Concession experience for Modern russia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article discusses the importance of the Soviet concession experience for the economy of modern Russia. The relevance of the study is determined by the complication of the socio-economic situation, which is directly related, in fact, to the sanctions war that the states of the so-called collective West (including the USA, Canada, Australia, etc.) have now declared to our country. The author, using historical and comparative methods, as well as content analysis and a dialectical approach, considers the existing points of view on this issue, showing the evolution of scientific views on the concession issues of the specified period. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the fundamental thesis, according to which, in the current realities of Russia, the experience in the field of concessions of the NEP period allows the Russian legislator, as well as representatives of the scientific and expert community, to creatively rethink the totality of the positive that was “acquired” at that time — for the purpose of creative reception for further improvement of the organizational, legal and economic components of the institution of public-private partnership (PPP) and, above all, in the form of concessions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".