MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306402857 · doi:10.1144/sp531-2022-136

Palinspastic restoration of Variscan oroclines – implications for dextral transpression and terrane affinities

2022· article· en· W4306402857 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Hynes, Stephen T. Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSinistral and dextralGeologyPaleontologyGondwanaTranspressionLaurasiaMassifCarboniferousForeland basinTerranePaleozoicFault (geology)Tectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Paleozoic Variscan orogen in Europe has a markedly circuitous trace for which several different origins have been postulated, including deformation around promontories on the colliding continental margins, extrusion within the collision zone, folding of a ribbon continent and collision with a substantial dextral component. Adopting the latter assumption, unfolding of the large, steeply plunging folds (‘oroclines’) of Iberia and the Moroccan Meseta requires more than 4000 km of dextral lateral translation of Laurussia with respect to Gondwana. Constraints on the age of the folding require that this lateral translation occurred in mid-late Carboniferous time. Significant dextral translation of Laurussia with respect to Gondwana late in the Variscan collision is supported by palaeomagnetic data for the two supercontinents, although the exact timing of this relative motion is not well constrained due to large uncertainties in the palaeomagnetic pole positions. Our palinspastic reconstruction of the major Variscan folds of Iberia places the rocks of the South Portuguese Zone of western Iberia adjacent to the Rhenish Massif; for instance, as part of Avalonia. By the same token, the Sehoul Block in the Moroccan Meseta probably originated at the western end of Cadomia, although nothing in our analysis precludes it also being derived from Avalonia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207