MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306404880 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.120410

A Deep Learning Approach for Biometric Security in Video Surveillance System Using Gait

2022· article· en· W4306404880 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Naseer Rajasab, Mohamed Rafi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaitBiometricsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkComputer visionPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video surveillance systems and biometrics inclusion play a significant part in various applications like a criminal investigation, medical rehabilitation, virtual reality, etc. Human Gait is a popular biometric where the individual is differentiated by unique limb actions and special ground reaction force. The unique movement of limb actions is called gait, and a record of 2-D aggregate floor response force through one walking cycle is called Cumulative Foot Pressure Images (CFPI). Both gait and cumulative foot pressure images can be acquired simultaneously of the same person during walking under a surveillance system for human identification. Accurate gait recognition is highly impactful for most applications and a major challenge for researchers due to various external factors like different shoes, mood, clothes, injuries etc., affects the individual gait. The novel system addresses the accuracy issue and proposes two models using the Deep Convolution Neural Network (DCNN) architecture on a large standard database, CASIA-D, containing gait pose and CFPI images of the same person. First, the model of the DCNN is trained using unique Gait Energy Image (GEI) features which reduce the computational time compared to other types of feature sets. The second model is prepared using the CFPI features. Experimentation has been carried out to evaluate the performance of these models with different optimization methods and activation functions and has proven that the DCNN model is far superior in building an accurate gait recognition system on large standard datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicGait Recognition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207