Consolidation settlement prediction using cone penetration testing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A reduction in the local groundwater table surrounding a mine, in the Abitibi-Témiscamingue region of Quebec, Canada, has led to dissipation of porewater pressure and displacement of the ground surface. The mechanical behavior of the site’s fine-grained soil has been studied in the laboratory (consolidation tests) and in-situ tests, particularly cone penetration tests (CPT). Additionally, displacements of the ground surface have been monitored for over 10 years. The consolidation settlements due to the groundwater table drawdown were calculated based on tip resistance values measured during the CPT. By comparing the calculated magnitudes and trends of vertical displacement with measured values, the consolidation calculation method using CPT data was validated. At some locations, there was a good match between the calculated and measured trends. At other survey monuments, the measured displacements were greater than calculated values. It was concluded that additional mechanisms were contributing to the displacements. The possible influence of these mechanisms varies spatially within the studied site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".