Lifelong Online Learning from Accumulated Knowledge
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we formulate lifelong learning as an online transfer learning procedure over consecutive tasks, where learning a given task depends on the accumulated knowledge. We propose a novel theoretical principled framework, lifelong online learning, where the learning process for each task is in an incremental manner. Specifically, our framework is composed of two-level predictions: the prediction information that is solely from the current task; and the prediction from the knowledge base by previous tasks. Moreover, this article tackled several fundamental challenges: arbitrary or even non-stationary task generation process, an unknown number of instances in each task, and constructing an efficient accumulated knowledge base. Notably, we provide a provable bound of the proposed algorithm, which offers insights on the how the accumulated knowledge improves the predictions. Finally, empirical evaluations on both synthetic and real datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it