A generalized single‐index linear threshold model for identifying treatment‐sensitive subsets based on multiple covariates and longitudinal measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Identification of a subset of patients who may be sensitive to a specific treatment is an important step towards personalized medicine. We consider the case where the effect of a treatment is assessed by longitudinal measurements, which may be continuous or categorical, such as quality of life scores assessed over the duration of a clinical trial. We assume that multiple baseline covariates, such as age and expression levels of genes, are available, and propose a generalized single‐index linear threshold model to identify the treatment‐sensitive subset and assess the treatment‐by‐subset interaction after combining these covariates. Because the model involves an indicator function with unknown parameters, conventional procedures are difficult to apply for inferences of the parameters in the model. We define smoothed generalized estimating equations and propose an inference procedure based on these equations with an efficient spectral algorithm to find their solutions. The proposed procedure is evaluated through simulation studies and an application to the analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial in advanced pancreatic cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".