MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306642500 · doi:10.1097/pai.0000000000001079

Using Deep Learning to Predict Final HER2 Status in Invasive Breast Cancers That are Equivocal (2+) by Immunohistochemistry

2022· article· en· W4306642500 on OpenAlexaff
Sean A. Rasmussen, Valerie Jones Taylor, Alexi P. Surette, Penny J. Barnes, Gillian Bethune

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsDr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunohistochemistryReceiver operating characteristicMedicineConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invasive breast carcinomas are routinely tested for HER2 using immunohistochemistry (IHC), with reflex in situ hybridization (ISH) for those scored as equivocal (2+). ISH testing is expensive, time-consuming, and not universally available. In this study, we trained a deep learning algorithm to directly predict HER2 gene amplification status from HER2 2+ IHC slides. Data included 115 consecutive cases of invasive breast carcinoma scored as 2+ by IHC that had follow-up HER2 ISH testing. An external validation data set was created from 36 HER2 IHC slides prepared at an outside institution. All internal IHC slides were digitized and divided into training (80%), and test (20%) sets with 5-fold cross-validation. Small patches (256×256 pixels) were randomly extracted and used to train convolutional neural networks with EfficientNet B0 architecture using a transfer learning approach. Predictions for slides in the test set were made on individual patches, and these predictions were aggregated to generate an overall prediction for each slide. This resulted in a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.83 with an overall accuracy of 79% (sensitivity=0.70, specificity=0.82). Analysis of external validation slides resulted in a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.79 with an overall accuracy of 81% (sensitivity=0.50, specificity=0.82). Although the sensitivity and specificity are not high enough to negate the need for reflexive ISH testing entirely, this approach may be useful for triaging cases more likely to be HER2 positive and initiating treatment planning in centers where HER2 ISH testing is not readily available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphologySame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207