Development of green‐colour‐emitting pyrotechnics as a core for 3 <scp>D</scp> temperature imaging sensors inside coal boilers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Efficiency in the control operation of the boilers for coal and coal with biomass can be further improved if the flue gas temperature distribution can be better characterized. This is very difficult in these harsh environmental systems, where spatially resolved measurements are nearly impossible with solid‐state sensors. In this work, we evaluate the development of pyrotechnic compounds that would serve as the basis for a novel optical mapping of the temperature inside coal boilers. For this purpose, various green‐colour‐emitting pyrotechnics using BaCl 2 · 2H 2 O and Ba(NO 3 ) 2 as the green light source were prepared, as this colour offers a distinct signal from the combustion‐based background in the boiler. These pyrotechnics were characterized using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and tested using a flat‐flame burner. Furthermore, the composition was varied to evaluate the effect of different metal fuels such as Sn, Co, and Mg, as well as various binders such as ethylcellulose, shellac, parlon, and PVC on green light emission. The emission intensity and the apparent ignition temperature were strongly dependent on the metal type, with Mg showing higher intensities. On the other hand, the effect of the binder showed that the ignition behaviour, emission intensity, and spectral purity were influenced by the nature and exothermicity of the binder. The addition of other potential green light‐producing materials, such as boric acid, increased the intensity of emission by 17% for a BaCl 2 · 2H 2 O‐based composition. This study identified prospective compositions with intense and bright green‐colour emissions that have high spectral purities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".