Drug-Repurposing Approach To Combat <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>: Biomolecular and Binding Interaction Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Staphylococcus aureus is considered as one of the most widespread bacterial pathogens and continues to be a prevalent cause of mortality and morbidity across the globe. FmtA is a key factor linked with methicillin resistance in S. aureus. Consequently, new antibacterial compounds are crucial to combat S. aureus resistance. Here, we present the virtual screening of a set of compounds against the available crystal structure of FmtA. The findings indicate that gemifloxacin, paromomycin, streptomycin, and tobramycin were the top-ranked potential drug molecules based on the binding affinity. Furthermore, these drug molecules were analyzed with molecular dynamics simulations, which showed that the identified molecules formed highly stable FmtA–inhibitor(s) complexes. Molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations suggested that the active site residues (Ser127, Lys130, Tyr211, and Asp213) of FmtA are crucial for the interaction with the inhibitor(s) to form stable protein–inhibitor(s) complexes. Moreover, fluorescence- and isothermal calorimetry-based binding studies showed that all the molecules possess dissociation constant values in the micromolar scale, revealing a strong binding affinity with FmtAΔ80, leading to stable protein–drug(s) complexes. The findings of this study present potential beginning points for the rational development of advanced, safe, and efficacious antibacterial agents targeting FmtA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".